CORRELATION BETWEEN THE MORPHOLOGY OF UNHEATED STAIRCASE AND ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Abstract

As a side effect of the need for greater energy efficiency of buildings, there is a problem of decrease of the available interior space affected by the reduction in U-value of parts of thermal building envelope, i.e. an increase in thickness of insulating layer, which is especially present in unheated staircase. Having in mind that present methods of calculation of transmission heat losses through elements of thermal envelope include the adjustment factor which regulates designed temperature conditions if the temperature at the colder side of the element of the thermal envelope differs from that of the external environment, this paper strives to demonstrate that in the case of unheated staircases, this fixed value should be reconsidered and treated as a variable depending on the morphology, i.e. form, size and position of the staircase within the building. This problem has been analyzed on the example of Serbian housing stock and relevant national thermal regulations. Three morphological types of unheated staircases have been distinguished within which three models have been defined and examined with respect to variations in number of floors and percentage of glazing. Average temperatures of staircase volume and temperature correction factors were calculated in following temperature modes: stationary that excluded solar gains and ventilation heat losses and gains, and dynamic with variations in air exchange rates and insolation conditions, expressing in all of the cases variations in calculated values of temperature correction factors in comparison to the prescribed fixed value.

Dates

  • Submission Date2013-07-03
  • Revision Date2014-01-16
  • Acceptance Date2014-01-16
  • Online Date2014-02-09

DOI Reference

10.2298/TSCI130703011R

References

  1. *** European Commission, Directive 2002/91/EC
  2. *** European Commission, Directive 2010/31/EU
  3. *** Regulations on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (in Serbian), the Government of the Republic of Serbia, "Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia" 61/2011, Belgrade, 2011.
  4. Olonscheck, M., Holsten, A., Kropp J, Heating and Cooling Energy Demand and Related Emissions of the German Residential Building Stock Under Climate Change, Energy Policy, 39 (2011), 2, pp. 4795-4806.
  5. Jovanović-Popović, M. et al., Atlas of Multyfamily Housing in Serbia (in Serbian and English), Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade and GIZ, Belgrade, 2013.
  6. Danielski, I., Energy variations in apartment building due to different shape factors and relative size of common area, Proceedings, (Ed. M. Bahram), World Renewable Energy Congress, Linköping, Sweden, 2011, Vol. 3, pp. 1000-1007.
  7. Danielski, I., Large variations in specific final energy use in Swedish apartment buildings: Causes and solutions, Energy and Buildings, 49 (2012), pp. 276-285.
  8. Pessenlehner, W., Mahdavi, A., Building morphology, transparence and energy performance, Proceedings, (Eds. G.Augenbroe, J. Hensen), Eighth International IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2003, Vol. 1, pp. 1025-1032.
  9. Praznik, M., et al., Simplified evaluation method for energy efficiency in single-family houses using key quality parameters, Energy and Buildings, 67(2013), pp. 489-499.
  10. EN ISO 13790:2008 Energy performance of buildings - Calculation of energy use for space heating and cooling
  11. Rajčić, A., T-Studio, original software package, Belgrade, 2011.