PERMEABILITY EVOLUTION OF UNLOADED COAL SAMPLES AT DIFFERENT LOADING RATES

Abstract

As coal mass is often at unloading status during mining process, it is of great significance to push on the research on permeability evolution of unloaded coal samples at different loading rates. A series of triaxial unloading experiments were conducted for initially intact coal samples using an improved rock mechanics testing system, and the permeability was continuously measured by the constant pressure differential method for methane. Permeability evolution law of unloaded coal samples and the influence mechanism of loading rates on that were studied. The results of triaxial unloading experiments indicate that the permeability of coal samples increases throughout the whole testing process without a descent stage, which is different from the permeability evolution law in conventional triaxial compression tests. The maximum permeability of unloaded coal sample, which is 4 to 18 times to its initial permeability, often appears before reaching the peak stress and increases with the decrease of axial loading rate. Stress state corresponding to the surge point of permeability of the unloaded coal samples is also discussed.

Keywords

Dates

  • Submission Date2013-10-01
  • Revision Date2014-05-12
  • Acceptance Date2014-07-12
  • Online Date2015-01-04

DOI Reference

10.2298/TSCI1405497Z

References

  1. Flores, R. M., Coalbed Methane: From Hazard to Resource, International Journal of Coal Geology, 35 (1998), 1, pp. 3-26
  2. Moore, T. A., Coalbed Methane: A Review, Int. Journal of Coal Geology, 101 (2012), Nov., pp. 36-81
  3. Beamish, B. B., Crosdale, P. J., Instantaneous Outbursts in Underground Coal Mines: An Overview and Association with Coal Type, International Journal of Coal Geology, 35 (1998), 1, pp. 27-55
  4. Chen, Z., et al., Effect of the Effective Stress Coefficient and Sorption-Induced Strain on the Evolution of Coal Permeability: Experimental Observations, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5 (2011), 5, pp. 1284-1293
  5. Siriwardane, H., et al., Influence of Carbon Dioxide on Coal Permeability Determined by Pressure Transient Methods, International Journal of Coal Geology, 77 (2009), 1, pp. 109-118
  6. Somerton, W. H., et al., Effect of Stress on Permeability of Coal, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,12 (1975), 5-6, pp. 129-145
  7. Dabbous, M. K., et al., The Permeability of Coal to Gas and Water, Old SPE Journal, 14 (1974), 6, pp. 563-572
  8. Mazumder, S., Wolf, K. H., Differential Swelling and Permeability Change of Coal in Response to CO2 Injection for ECBM, International Journal of Coal Geology, 74 (2008), 2, pp. 123-138
  9. Wang, G., et al., Sorption-Induced Swelling/Shrinkage and Permeability of Coal under Stressed Adsorption/ Desorption Conditions, International Journal of Coal Geology, 83 (2010), 1, pp. 46-54
  10. Wang, S., et al., Permeability Evolution in Fractured Coal: The Roles of Fracture Geometry and Watercontent, International Journal of Coal Geology, 87 (2011), 1, pp. 13-25
  11. Pan, Z., et al., Laboratory Characterisation of Coal Reservoir Permeability for Primary and Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery, International Journal of Coal Geology, 82 (2010), 3-4, pp. 252-261
  12. Gray, I., Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams, SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2 (1987), 1, pp. 28-34
  13. Harpalani, S., Chen, G., Influence of Gas Production Induced Volumetric Strain on Permeability of Coal, Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 15 (1997), 4, pp. 303-325
  14. Gilman, A., Beckie, R., Flow of Coal-Bed Methane to a Gallery, Transport in Porous Media, 41 (2000), 1, pp. 1-16
  15. Shi, J. Q., Durucan, S., Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coal beds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery, Transport in Porous Media, 56 (2004), 1, pp. 1-16
  16. Cui, X., Bustin, R. M., Volumetric Strain Associated with Methane Desorption and Its Impact on Coalbed Gas Production from Deep Coal Seams, AAPG Bulletin, 89 (2005), 9, pp. 1181-1202
  17. Liu, J., et al., Linking Gas-sorption Induced Changes in Coal Permeability to Directional Strains through a Modulus Reduction Ratio, International Journal of Coal Geology, 83 (2010), 1, pp. 21-30
  18. Chen, Z., et al., Influence of the Effective Stress Coefficient and Sorption-Induced Strain on the Evolution of Coal Permeability: Model Development and Analysis, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 8 (2012), May, pp. 101-110
  19. Xie, H., et al., Influence of Different Mining Layouts on the Mechanical Properties of Coal, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 22 (2012), 6, pp. 749-755
  20. Ai, T., et al., Space-Time Evolution Rules of Acoustic Emission Location of Unloaded Coal Sample at Different Loading Rates, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 22 (2012), 6, pp. 847-854
  21. Wang, S., et al., Permeability Evolution during Progressive Deformation of Intact Coal and Implications for Instability in Underground Coal Seams, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 58 (2013), pp. 34-45
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages1497 -1504