Estimation of condensate mass flow rate during purging time in heat recovery steam generator of combined cycle power plant

Abstract

In this paper the transient modeling of HRSG (Heat recovery steam generator) in purging time was considered. In purging time, compressed air from the gas turbine was used to purge a combustible gas from HRSG. During this time; steam condensate was formed in the superheater stage which should be drained completely to avoid some problems such as deformation of superheaters. Because of this reason, estimation of drain formation is essential to avoid this problem. In this paper an energy model was provided and this model was solved by MATLAB software. Average model error is about 5%. Results show that, during purge time, steam temperature was decreased from 502 (oC) (Superheater 2), 392 (oC) (Superheater1) and 266 (oC) (Evaporators 1&2) to 130 (oC), 130 (oC) and 220 (oC), respectively and also steam pressure was decreased from 52 (bar) to 23(bar) during purge time. At end of purge time, condensate formation was about 220 (l) when inlet gas temperature was equal to 100 (oC) and purge gas mass flow rate was equal to 386.86 (kg/s).

Dates

  • Submission Date2011-10-31
  • Revision Date2012-04-04
  • Acceptance Date2012-05-04

DOI Reference

10.2298/TSCI111031102E

References

  1. J.H.Horlock. "Combined power plants—past, present, and future". ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 117 (1995) 608-16.
  2. S.Sanaye,S. and M.Rezazadeh, " Transient thermal modeling of heat recovery steam generators in combined cycle power plants", International journal of energy research 122 (2006) 547-556.
  3. M.Pearson. and R.W.Anderson " Reliability and Durability from Large Heat Recovery Steam Generators". Proceeding Institute Mechanical Engineering 1999: 213 Part A.
  4. R.Krowech, R.; L.Stanley; LLC Deltak Avoid damage from HRSG cycling; Power Magazine, March/April 1998
  5. "HRSG Users Handbook, "Design Operation and Maintenance", R.C.Swankekamp , HRSG Users Group,2006
  6. P.J.Dechamps. "Modeling the transient behavior of heat recovery steam generators". Journal of Power and Energy 209 (1995) 265-273.
  7. M. Valdes, A. Rovira, M.D. Duran, Influence of the heat recovery steam generator design parameters on the thermoeconomic performances of combined cycle gas turbine power plants, Int, Journal of Energy Research 28 (2004) 1243-1254.
  8. M. Mohagheghi, J. Shayegan, Thermodynamic optimization of design variable and heat exchangers layout in HRSGs for CCGT using genetic algorithm, Applied Thermal Engineering 29 (2009) 290-299.
  9. E. Godoy, N.J. Scenna, S.J. Benz, Families of optimal thermodynamic solutions for combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plants, Applied Thermal Engineering 30 (2010) 569-576.
  10. N. Woudstra, T. Woudstra, A. Pirone, T. van der Stelt, Thermodynamic evaluation of combined cycle plants, Energy Conversion and Management 51 (2010) 1099-1110.
  11. A. Bahadori*, H.B.Vuthaluru. A method for estimation of recoverable heat from blow down systems during steam generation. Energy 35 (2010) 3501-3507.
  12. ESCOA Corp. ESCOA Fintube Manual. Tulsa, OK: ESCOA, 1979.
  13. Carpenter, E.F. and Colburn , A.P., 1951." The effect of velocity on condensation inside tubes", Proc. Of General Discussion on Heat Transfer,20-26, IMechE/ASME.
  14. Collier, J.G., "Convective boiling and condensation", Second edition, 1981.
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages1389 -1397