SUSTAINABLE NUCLEAR ENERGY DILEMMA

Abstract

Sustainable energy development implies the need for the emerging potential energy sources which are not producing adverse effect to the environment. In this respect nuclear energy has gained the complimentary favor to be considered as the potential energy source without degradation of the environment. he sustainability evaluation of the nuclear energy systems has required the special attention to the criteria for the assessment of nuclear energy system before we can make firm justification of the sustainability of nuclear energy systems. n order to demonstrate the sustainability assessment of nuclear energy system this exercise has been devoted to the potential options of nuclear energy development, namely: short term option, medium term option, long term option and classical thermal system option. Criteria with following indicators are introduced in this analysis: nuclear indicator, economic indicator, environment indicator, social indicator... The Sustainability Index is used as the merit for the priority assessment among options under consideration.

Keywords

Dates

  • Submission Date2012-10-22
  • Revision Date2012-11-03
  • Acceptance Date2012-11-27

DOI Reference

10.2298/TSCI121022214A

References

  1. Energy analysis of power system, World nuclear association, March (2006), world-nuclear.org
  2. Accelerator -driven System, Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD (2002)
  3. Accelerator Driven System and fast reactor in Advanced Fuel Cycle, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2005
  4. Rao K.R., Radioactive waste: The problem and its management, Current Science, Vol.81,No.12, Dec.(2001)
  5. The treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons ( NPT),2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of nuclear weapon, Mart (2000), New York
  6. A technology roadmap for generation IV Nuclear Power System, US DOE Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and Generation IV International Forum, Dec. (2002)
  7. Marvin L., Sustainable Energy from Nuclear Fission Power, National Academy of Engineering, Vol 32, No.24. Winter (2002)
  8. Nuclear Technology Review 2007, International Atomic Energy Agency ,Vienna, (2007)
  9. Beckjord Eric .S., Future of Nuclear Power, MIT Study, 2003, ISBN 0-615-12420-8,
  10. Agenda 21, Chapter 35, Science for Sustainable Development, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development,(1992)
  11. Report of the United Nation Conference on Environment and Development, Vol.1,Chapter 7,June,(1992)
  12. Nikitin B., A. Andrews, M.Holt, Management the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Congressional Research Center - RL 34234, July, 2009
  13. Plan of Implementation ,World Summit on Sustainability Development, Johannesburg, (2002)
  14. Laes E., PhD These, Nuclear energy and Sustainability, Katolicke University ,Leuven, Oct.(2006)
  15. Accelerator Driven Reactor, Nuclear World Association, March 2009
  16. Sokolov Y.A., Kagiamanan, V.S. Mc Donalds A., Nuclear Power in 21 st Century and Role in Developing Countries, International Journal of Nuclear Power, Vol.18, NO.2-3, pp. 20-26, 2004
  17. Ward D.J., Cook, I. Leckon Y., Socie R., The Economic viability of fission power, Fission Engineering and design, 75-79, (2005), pp.1221-1227
  18. Reduction CO2 emission- nuclear and other alternatives, The role of nuclear power in a low carbon emission, March (2006)
  19. Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development, IAEA (2006)
  20. Nuclear Power, IEA Energy Technologies Essential, IEAWEA, March (2007), www.iea.org/Textbase/techno/essential.htl ( date Aug.10,2009) 22
  21. Volen R., Beeley R.J. , Energy Source for Future, Energy Science (1974), Vol.1, Issue 2, , pp.187-200
  22. Medium Term Strategy of Nuclear Energy, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005
  23. Fast Breeder Reactor, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_breeder_reactor ( date Aug.10,2009)
  24. Adriani R. , Energy Strategy Toward Fusion, (2005) Fusion Power Association,
  25. Ongena J., van Oost G., Energy for Future Centuries, Journal of Fusion Science and Technology, (2006) Vol.49,N0.21, pp.3-15
  26. Radovanovic P., Power Plant Life Cycle Extension, Clean Technology ( in Serbian) Power Plant Symposium 2008
  27. Wilson R., Sustainable Nuclear Energy - Some Reasons for Optimism , Harvard University, Oct. (2005)
  28. Sulach D., The Nuclear Dilemma, Nonproliferation Institute, University of North Carolina (2005)
  29. Carter L.J., A Global; Approach to the Nuclear Dilemma, Cosmos Club of Washington DC,( 2005)
  30. Hovanov N. Kornikov V. , Seregin I. Qualitative Information Processing in DSS ASPID-3W for Complex Objects Estimation under Uncertainty, Proceedings of the International Conference "Informatics and Control". St. Petersburg (Russia), (1997), pp.808-816
  31. Hovanov N. V., Fedorov Y. V., Zakharov V. V., The Making of Index Number under Uncertainty, Advances in Sustainable Development Environmental Indices, Ed: Y.Pykh, D.E. Haytt, R.J.M.Lenz, EOLSS Publishers Co., Oxford,UK,(1999)
  32. Afgan N.H.,Carvalho M.G., Hovanov A.N, Energy System Assessment with Sustainability Indicators, Energy Policy, 28 (2000), pp.603-612
  33. Afgan N.H, Carvalho M. G., Quality, Sustainability and Indicators of Energy Systems, Begell House Publisher, (2009)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages305 -321