THERMAL MASS IMPACT ON ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF A LOW, MEDIUM AND HEAVY MASS BUILDING IN BELGRADE

Abstract

Heavy mass materials used in building structures and architecture can ignificantly affect building energy performance and occupant comfort. The urpose of this study was to investigate if thermal mass can improve the internal nvironment of a building, resulting in lower energy requirements from the echanical systems. The study was focused on passive building energy erformance and compared annual space heating and cooling energy equirements for an office building in Belgrade with several different pplications of thermal mass. A three-dimensional building model was generated o represent a typical office building. Building shape, orientation, glazing to wall atio, envelope insulation thickness, and indoor design conditions were held onstant while location and thickness of building mass (concrete) was varied etween cases in a series of energy simulations. The results were compared and iscussed in terms of the building space heating and cooling energy and demand ffected by thermal mass. The simulation results indicated that with addition of hermal mass to the building envelope and structure: 100% of all simulated cases xperienced reduced annual space heating energy requirements, 67% of all imulated cases experienced reduced annual space cooling energy requirements, 3% of all simulated cases experienced reduced peak space heating demand and 0% of all simulated cases experienced reduced peak space cooling demand. The tudy demonstrated that there exists a potential for reducing space heating and ooling energy requirements with heavy mass construction in the analyzed limate region (Belgrade, Serbia).

Dates

  • Submission Date2012-04-09
  • Revision Date2012-07-11
  • Acceptance Date2012-07-20

DOI Reference

10.2298/TSCI120409182A

References

  1. ***, University of Maryland, 2005; Solar Decathlon Team. Thermal Mass. 2005; 2005.solarteam.org/page.php?id=223.
  2. Szokolay S.V. Dynamic Response of Buildings, in: Introduction to Architectural Science - The basis of sustainable design (Szokolay S.V.). Architectural Press / Elsevier, Burlington 2004; pp. 45-49
  3. Givoni, Baruch. Minimizing Cooling Needs By Building Design, in: Passive and Low Energy Cooling for Buildings (Givoni, B.).: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York 1994; pp. 21-34.
  4. ***, Sustainable Energy Authority Victoria. Thermal mass info fact sheet. 2004; pp. 1-6 www.sustainability.vic.gov.au/resources/documents/Thermal_mass.pdf.
  5. ***, Chapter 35, Sustainability, in: 2009 ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook; pp. 35.6-35.8
  6. Easton, D. Mass Walls Mean Thermal Comfort, in: Home Energy Magazine Online May/June 1999; p. 37.
  7. ***, Chapter 34, Thermal Storage, in: 2003 ASHRAE Applications Handbook; pp. 34.1-34.2
  8. Simmonds P. The utilization and optimization of a building thermal inertia in minimizing the overall energy use. ASHRAE Transactions 1991; pp. 1031-1042.
  9. Braun, J.E. Reducing energy costs and peak electrical demand through optimal control of building thermal storage. ASHRAE Transaction 1990; pp. 876-888.
  10. ***, City of Santa Monica. Santa Monica Green Building Program. Thermal Mass. 2010; www.smgov.net/Departments/OSE/Categories/Green_Building/Guidelines/Envelope_+_Space_Pl anning/Thermal_Mass.aspx. Paper submitted:
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages447 -459