HIGH ACTIVITY CARBON SORBENTS FOR MERCURY CAPTURE

Abstract

High efficiency activated carbons have been prepared for removing mercury from gas streams. Starting materials used were petroleum coke, lignite, charcoal and olive seed waste, and were chemically activated with KOH. Produced adsorbents were primarily characterized for their porosity by N2 adsorption at 77K. Their mercury retention capacity was characterized based on the breakthrough curves. Compared with typical commercial carbons, they have exhibited considerably enhanced mercury adsorption capacity. An attempt has been made to correlate mercury entrapment and pore structure. It has been shown that physical surface area is increased during activation in contrast to the mercury adsorption capacity that initially increases and tends to decrease at latter stages. Desorption of active sites may be responsible for this behavior.

Keywords

Dates

  • Submission Date2005-07-22
  • Revision Date2006-01-19
  • Acceptance Date2006-03-14

References

  1. Serre D. S., Silcox D. G., Adsorption of elemental mercury on the residual carbon in coal fly ash, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39 (2000), pp. 1723-1730
  2. Krishnan S.V., Gullett K.B., Jozewicz W., Sorption of elemental mercury by activated carbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28 (1994), pp. 1506-1512
  3. Hsing-Cheng H., Rood J. M., Rostam-Abadi M., Shiaoguo C., Ramsay C., Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs), Environ. Sci. Technol., 35 (2001), pp. 2785-2791
  4. Stavropoulos G. G., Precursor materials suitability for super activated carbons production, Fuel Processing Technology, 86 (2005), 11, pp. 1151-1240
  5. Rouquerol F., Rouquerol J. and Sing K., Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids, Academic Press, London, 1999, pp. 166
  6. Rouquerol F., Rouquerol J. and Sing K., Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids, Academic Press, London, 1999, pp. 19
  7. Mendioroz S., Guijarro M. I., Bermejo P. J. and Munoz V., Mercury retrieval from flue gas by monolithic adsorbents based on sulfurized sepiolite, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33 (1999), pp. 1697-
  8. Mercedes Maroto-Valer M., Zhang Y., Granite, E. J., Tang Z. and Pennline H. W., Effect of porous structure and surface functionality on the mercury capacity of a fly ash carbon and its activated sample, Fuel, 84 (2005) pp. 105-108
  9. Guijarro M. I., Mendioroz S. and Munoz V., Effect of morphology of sulfurized materials in the retention of mercury from gas streams, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37 (1998) pp. 1088-1094
  10. Hancai Z., Feng J. and Jia G., Removal of elemental mercury from coal combustion flue gas by chloride-impregnated activated carbon, Fuel 83 (2004) pp. 143-146
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages19 -26